When it comes to SAP testing, growth brings both opportunity and strain. What once worked can start to buckle under the pressure of scale. As teams expand and projects multiply, risk finds new ways to slip through the cracks. 

The Hero Model: Great for Comics, Risky for QA 

https://www.worksoft.com/resources/blogs/part-1-the-heroic-sap-testing-team/In Part 1 of this series, we looked at the “hero model,” a traditional testing approach where a few highly skilled specialists or “heroes” carry the full weight of performing manual testing and safeguarding quality through individual expertise. 
 

While this mode can work in smaller environments, it quickly breaks down as organizations grow. Overreliance on  a few key experts creates bottlenecks, diverts top talent from strategic work, and increases the chance of missed defects. As organizations grow, so does the burden on these heroes creating inefficiency, bloodspots and unstable workloads. Ultimately, as the organization scales, critical hidden defects are more likely to slip through the cracks. 

Evolving Quality: The Road to Testing Maturity 

To scale successfully, testing practices must just as business processes do. Standardization, structure, and repeatability become the foundation of mature testing practices. By formalizing how testing is planned, executed, and managed, organizations gain consistency, visibility, and control allowing experts to focus on value creation rather than firefighting. At this stage, testing transforms from a reactive task to a strategic process.  
 
Well-managed organizations begin adopting standardized approaches to testing. Best practices such as documentation, enterprise architecture, and risk-based testing all play distinct but connected roles in reducing risk, improving visibility, and freeing experts to focus on higher-value work. 

Formalized Documentation 

What changes: 

• Time-and-motion studies and process documentation become formalized and standardized, creating a consistent foundation for quality assurance. These practices are then used to create standard testing requirements that align with how the business actually operates.   

• Each change request or business process update is documented and stored in a centralized library, which serves as both a training resource and a reliable reference point for future testing cycles. 

• Business processes follow a defined design, change, and approval cycle that mirrors modern software development practices and becoming an integrated part of the testing lifecycle.  

Why it matters: 

• Clear documentation means faster test design, stronger traceability, and fewer surprises. Testing cycles accelerate because teams have clear, accessible documentation that defines what to test, why it matters, and how changes ripple across the business. the result is faster test design, stronger traceability, and repeatable quality assurance. 

Developing Purposeful Enterprise Architecture 

What changes:  

• Mapping the enterprise and its structure, processes, and data flows becomes a disciplined organizational activity. This approach defines both current and target states, aligning business processes with technology to support strategic goals.  

• By documenting how business processes and technology work together, enterprise architecture reduces complexity and supports continuous improvement across the organization.   

Why it matters: 

• Shared Language: Business and testing teams develop a common language, allowing business experts to step back from repetitive testing, while  QA testing teams gain the clarity they need to protect the business from costly, disruptive change-related events. 

• Business Continuity: Clear documentation and collaboration help prevent outages and disruptions during routine updates, keeping systems stable and reliable. 

• Accelerated Projects: Less time spent on repetitive testing cycles and more time moving projects forward. The result: faster delivery without cutting corners on quality. 

Risk-Based Testing 

What changes: 

• With standardized documentation, structured change management, and clear enterprise mapping in place, teams can shift from broad, manual testing to risk-based approaches focusing where it matters most. 

Why it matters: 

• Fewer blind spots, fewer surprises. By testing based on real business risk, organizations prevent costly disruptions and gain confidence that critical processes won’t break under change. 

What Comes Next 

Model #3 – Automating Quality Processes 

Even the best quality processes reach their limit. Standardization brings structure and predictability, but it still relies on people who can become overextended and distracted. Documentation helps, but it can’t keep pace with the pace of modern change. 

That’s when automation becomes the next leap forward. 

In Part 3 of this series, we’ll explore how Automating Quality Processes transforms quality from a manual burden into a dynamic, change-aware engine of assurance. Automation reduces dependence on business experts, shortens test cycles, and makes DevOps a practical reality in SAP environments.  

Stay tuned… 

Want to learn more before the next post?  

Choose how you’d like to move forward:   

Speak to a consultant about improving testing for SAP 

Visit our website to explore how Worksoft helps QA teams deliver automation that works